Here’s a language issue that’s new to me.
The other day on Twitter @The_GrammarGeek asked:
‘There’s an opinion out there that it’s wrong to use “done” to mean “finished,” as in, “I’m done with my homework.” But this use of “done” has been widely used since the 15th century. Any idea/when where the false rule originated?’
Another tweep, Karen Conlin (thanks, Karen!) then tweeted that this issue is not mentioned in my edition of Fowler (4th edn., 2015), and asked if I could shed any light on it. Here goes, then…
If you’re in a hurry…
- That highly specific use (= ‘to have finished, completed + NOUN’) seems to be mainly U.S.
- So, strictures against it have no reason to appear in Br.E. manuals.
- That specific use is 18th century onwards, rather than 15th.
- According to M-W’s Concise Dict. of English Usage, objections to it were first raised in 1917, with no obvious justification.
If you’ve got longer…
Here’s my two pennies’ worth.
First, to use ‘done’ in exactly that construction, namely, HAVE + done + with + NOUN and with that precise meaning (= ‘to have completed’), is not something I personally would say (is not part of my ‘idiolect’), and – I’m speculating here – is not something most Br.E. speakers would say either. (Looking for evidence in do, one of the most common verbs in the language, could be a Herculean, not to say Sisyphean, enterprise!)
However, I might say ‘I’m done with blogging’, using the pattern to be done with + –ing form (verbal noun), but I think that is a slightly different meaning (‘I will never do it again’ = ‘I’m through with blogging’).
And I would also write, though probably not say, the standard phrase ‘let’s tell him and be done with it’.
If the above claim is true, then there is no reason why a fatwa against the use should exist in Br.E. usage manuals. I’ve checked in all three previous editions of Fowler, and the issue has not been treated. My additions and amendments were based on notes kept over several years about issues that had struck me, and this was not one of them.
Second, what exactly is this use, and where does it come from?
What can the OED can tell us?
The previous edition (1989) makes it a second sub-sense under the more general, somewhat undifferentiated rubric of
‘8. (In pa. pple. and perf. tenses.) To accomplish, complete, finish, bring to a conclusion. to be done, to be at an end.’
The sub-sense is headed
‘b. to be done is used of the agent instead of ‘to have done’, in expressing state rather than action. (Chiefly Irish, Sc., U.S., and dial.)
That geographical information in brackets is important.
The first example given dates to 1766, from T. Amory’s Life of John Buncle II. x. 365
I was done with love for ever.
(Amory, btw, grew up in Ireland.)
The second citation, however, is from Thomas Jefferson: 1771 T. Jefferson Let. T. Adams in Harper’s Mag. No. 482. 206
One farther favor and I am done.
The current edition (3rd edn., March 2014) is more nuanced. It puts that Life of John Buncle quotation (I was done with love for ever) at the head of a category (10. a. (b)) captioned thus:
‘Of a person: to be at the end of one’s dealings with, to have no further truck with; = sense10b(b).’
In other words, it makes it equivalent to ‘to have done with something/someone’ as in Shakespeare’s Do what thou wilt for I haue done with thee, and as the earlier edition also did.
On that analysis, the Buncle quote could have been I had done with love forever.
The meaning that is truly the one at issue, I think, is now lexicographed as follows (underlining mine):
‘10. a. (c) Of a person or other agent of action: to be at the end of what one is doing, to be finished. Also with complement expressing the action being finished. Now chiefly U.S.’
That note ‘chiefly U.S.’ chimes with Karen’s hunch that the use is more U.S. than British and is substantiated by the citations the OED chose:
The Jefferson quote heads that category, and the other examples are, with one exception, U.S.:
1876 H. B. Smith in Life (1881) 404 After this is done I am done.
1879 Literary World 6 Dec. 400/1 The mills of the gods are not yet done grinding.
1883 Cent. Mag. 25 767/1 ‘Going..at twenty-four thousand dollars! Are you all done?’ He scanned the crowd.
1971 M. B. Powell & G. Higman Finite Simple Groups i. 5 Since g is arbitrary, we are done [i.e. we have completed the proof].
1981 J. Blume Tiger Eyes (1982) xxi. 87 ‘Davey..are you almost done?’ Jane calls, knocking on the bathroom door.
2000 A. Hagy Keeneland 242 You are full of total dog shit. I’m done putting up with you.
Note the examples with the –ing form, which I noted earlier that I would use. I might also say, similarly to the 1981 example above, ‘Are you quite done!’ as a retort to someone, for example, who was being rude or offensive at length.
Quick statistical note
A trawl in the Feb. 2018 ‘Monitor Corpus’ of the Oxford English Corpus for the string BE + done + with + –ing form retrieves 1,029 examples. Almost half are of unknown source, but of those whose source is known 265 are U.S., 65 British, e.g.
DANIEL Craig is said to be done with playing Bond, but producers are willing to do the impossible to keep the superstar happy.
An earlier version of the corpus (2014) shows a not dissimilar ratio.
Yes, but what about the prohibition against?
As I mentioned at the beginning, the M-W dict.’s earliest note is from 1917. The M-W entry also notes the Heritage Usage Panel in 1969 47 percent disapproved of it, suggesting that it was a rule that had been forced on many of them.
Is it still being trotted out/bandied about? If so, please let me know where.